It is paramount for all drivers to be vigilant in driving more so with regards to drugs and alcohol intake. Driving under Influence (DUI) or Driving with Intoxication (DWI) is inversely proportional to public safety. Once a driver tests positive or above the legal driving limits in the field sobriety test and the blood alcohol tests, you become a guest at the convicted perimeter walls. The aftermath could entrance counts of DUI or DWI, damage of public or own property, and regrettable circumstances surrounding DUI such as accidents, injuries, deaths and so on.
The charges may attract undesirable penalties such as hefty fines, a conviction in prison, involuntarily alcohol education, mandatory compliance with ignition interlock law, community service, probation and restricting or withholding of the driving license by the state. This is disruptive to once personal and career life although very necessary in the assurance of public safety. Since accidents are unforeseen it is important to seek legal counsel of a DWI lawyer or Criminal attorney should something of this nature happen.
The company is changing the Americans’ approach to charges of drunk driving or driving with intoxication. Their team of DWI lawyer helps one with the charges navigate them possibly evading them or lowering the court determination. They can table a legal defense on behalf of their client, advise them on their response and offer legal assistance. If the arrest was not right or some evidence lack material facts in solidifying the case, an attorney could argue in favor of their client.
The lawsuits could be loathsome and extremely stressful considering the weight the authorities put on DWI or DUI offenders. Nonetheless, the process is now easier to go through; linking you up with a lawyer who will work tirelessly hand in hand with you until you beat the charges. If you have ever had these charges levied against you or someone close to you, your crystal clear understand the relief DUIwise has brought.
First, forward cases of drunk driving or driving while intoxicated, are diverse and unique, with different charges altogether hence call for the distinct approach. They could range from little-drunk driving to also include unfortunate happenings following drunk driving. There have been many cases brought forth as DUIwise.com by law offender in North Carolina seeking counsel pending their charges.
The Indiana Police pulled over Indianapolis Colts proprietor, Jim Irsay for alleged driving under the influence. This was after observing his movements on traffic; random stopping, sluggish driving, and failure to follow turn signals. Irsay failed the field sobriety tests administered to him by the officer which made them determine he was driving under the influence of alcohol. He also faces four other charges of possession of illicit substances in his car. Legally each of these counts attracts a time in prison of between six months and three years.
The National Football League responded to the case and prompted some disciplinary charges on Irsay’s conduct. Nevertheless, Irsay’s defense attorney took the police on a rocky road trying to justify claims of his clients’ drunken driving, the validity of the field sobriety test and what criteria is used to differentiate an illicit narcotic substance from one that is not. Successfully, the attorney was able to free Jim Irsay from the Hamilton County Jail sentence but not without a bond penalty of $22,500.
Another bizarre scenario on the DUIwise blog post is of Kalamazoo, 21 years based in Michigan on the West Michigan Avenue. The man drove into Western Michigan University allegedly under the influence. Reportedly, the man flew from the scene of the crime in an unsteady motion and numbed to notice the presence of injuries on his body. Hours later the police caught up with him. In addition to drunken driving charges, he also was driving with a suspended license, left the scene and damage to public safety. In the latter case, drugs were found while apparently in this instance there is damage to property. Additionally, power lines were thwarted for more than an hour at the West Michigan Avenue. This shows the uniqueness of each case although the basis is either DWI or DUI.
Kalamazoo’s attorney could reduce the penalties to his client by proving loopholes in the toxicology test or the whole process if any. Some inherent medical conditions and prescribed medications could result in a bad performance. Although law enforcement is at stake in this case primarily, justifiable concerns can be raised to try beating the charges.
An Intoxicated, high school teacher was arrested by the Florida police on her way to report on duty. The car she was driving in was being carelessly driven; meandering on the Imperial Highway. The women objected to the allegations of being intoxicated although all pointers were irrevocable. She had glassy eyes, staggering and responses during interrogation were questionable. This prompted the police to conduct Breathalyzer test with results being 253% and 273% after repetition. This by far and large is beyond the accepted legal limit. This is punishable even in the absence of accidents or injuries.
A counter-argument to her case, a council, would seek charges on the matter reduced by questioning the validity, standardization, and reliability of the sobriety tests. This is subject to possible alteration of one’s body due to a medical condition, which makes results not entirely dependable.
These are not the only case reported and of drivers seeking legal assistance. Unfortunate events have been happening, and they take different forms and nature. Although, drinking under the influence and driving while intoxicated charges can convict one. Additional charges only add up the penalty burden as will be determined by the court. Vehicular homicide, used of expired or restricted license, careless operation of a vehicle, destruction the property, possession of illegal drugs and death, negatively spices the case.
Pleas from the defense may prove futile while some may be accepted and minimize the impact of the charges. An attorney depends largely on the police initial reports versus the defendant’s narration of events to build up the defense. There is just too much stake in DWI or DUI, but at the site all the agony can be dropped.